Some of this comes straight from IRC. It’s 3:40am and I’m speaking my mind. Blame Lemon Jelly, the last track on their immensely brilliant new album got me in the pondering mood.
The eternal quandry is this: I love musicians and their music, and yet I can’t afford to buy all of it. This is how capatalism works, which is fine. Either way, I don’t want to buy CDs which I’ll rip once and never use again - it’s a waste of money, it’s bad for the environment and if I owned all the music I am in possesion of (even at this moment) I’d need acres of storage space to stack all the bloody things. Peoplekind has moved on. Peoplekind has spoken: we don’t need bits of plastic, and plastic boxes with paper inlays. Music is digital, it exists in the ether, it can travel from New York to London to Tokyo in an eye’s blink. Compact Discs are defunct. Musical culture is truly global. This is brilliant.
So I figure I should be paying ~£5 for an album of mp3s. Think how much music publishers would save if they didn’t have to make CDs. I told you to think about it because I don’t know exactly how much they’d save, maybe you do. CDs are cheap to mass-produce, sure, but think of all the jobs they could do without, all the factories they could close, all the shipping charges and cuts given to retailers. All that stuff - gone. That’s a lot of money. They already sell mp3s, but they’re hideously overpriced. A true embracing of this new digital music culture means dumping the past, and ceasing to dump the overheads onto the consumers (or fans - you know, the people who keep them housed and fed) by way of ridiculous price hikes. In fact, with no need to mass produce and distribute CDs, who the hell needs a publisher anyway? That’s another issue.
If musicians followed this route entirely they’d still make a substantial amount of money - maybe not as much as they did before, or maybe (paradoxically perhaps) they’d make more (if the fat cats didn’t take a cut, or didn’t exist). Besides, whoever said that being a musician was about being rich. It’s not. I think that this digital music culture would also be beneficial in elminating bands who can’t cut it as legitimate artists - those ‘manufactured’ solely for the purposes of making money, which are entirely excrable. I have nothing against the quality of that type of music (which is not to say the quality in terms of musical standard, but the aural qualities that say whether it’s good to listen to) - but making music for money is shit, pure and simple (no pun intended, pop lovers).
That’s what I think, anyway. And now I shall get back to downloading The Beatles entire back catalogue.
Joke.