July 15, 2008

[old] Book review: Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenence

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rob @ 7:16 am

[This article was originally written by me on May 3rd 2005. I had lost my copy of the article, but on a whim I dug it up via WayBackMachine (what a internet stalwart!), as a missive from the past. Still a good book, naturally.]

Zen's brilliant cover.‘NEVER JUDGE A BOOK BY ITS COVER’. And yet how exactly does respond to a cover, and indeed title, like that? Incredulity, I’d expect, followed closely by intrigue. At least that’s how I approached it. Background is perhaps necessary.

I was recommended the book. It seems this book has a long tradition of being a book that people recommend to others, and I kind of like that - it ties in with the style of the writing. I was recommended it by two people within the same week, one a friend studying philosophy who raved that it had helped him understand his course again (or for the first time), and another who had himself been recommended it a month back by his friend. Of course, I just had to look up this book that everyone (it seemed) was talking about. Suddenly I had the sensation that I was entering into something bigger than myself - some massive, mysterious book cult.

Once I’d briefly glanced at that cover, and just about made out the quirky text (and re-read it to make sure), I hesitated before scrolling down to read the summary. I knew nothing about the book - my friends had both been anxious not to reveal anything - and I wondered whether it was a good idea to actually find out what other people felt it was about before reading it myself. So I remained blissfully ignorant and swiftly purchased it.

You might have noticed I’m skirting around the topic here. And for a few days prior to this, I’ve been skirting around the whole issue of writing about this at all. You’ll forgive me for wanting to do justice to such a brilliant book. If any judgments can be made at all, it seems best to ignore the ancient proverb, and judge this book precisely by its cover. As I reached the final sentence, I flipped the book over in my hands and re-read the title. What had first seemed a bizarre pairing of two totally unrelated subjects, something perhaps concocted to entice people to a dusty text, was, upon reaching the end of the book, rendered absolutely clear: a perfectly beautiful bannerhead for everything that Pirsig’s work stands for. It was a stunning moment. It would be impossible to explain just why this happens, so let that stand as a firm recommendation from me to you to read the book and find out. But now I want to talk about the book itself.

Zen is an interwoven text, sort of like a quilt, where each part is somehow connected to the rest even if you can’t see each individual fibre. The author describes it early on as a Chautauqua - “like the travelling tent-show Chautauquas that used to move across American - this America - […] popular talks intended to edify and entertain, improve the mind and bring culture and enlightenment to the ear and thoughts of the hearer (sic).” (p.15) Zen is one man’s thoughts and opinions on life. Normally, given the current quality of similar projects, you’d be about to switch off. Pirsig acknowledges this here, and explains exactly what he wants to achieve. He wants to change minds. This is a passionate man on a mission, and his words are suitably intense, descriptive, powerful and often beautiful. At times his words are precise, as precise as words come, cleaving down to ideas about the words themselves - thoughts about thoughts. At other times his words are soft, broad but nimble brush strokes painting a sky and a road and a motorcycle and the journey ahead.

“I am happy to be riding back into this country. It is a kind of nowhere, famous for nothing at all, and has an appeal because of just that. Tensions disappear along old roads like this. We bump along the beat-up concrete between the cattails and the stretches of meadow and then more cattails and marsh grass. Here and there is a stretch of open water and if you look closely you can see wild ducks at the edge of the cattails. And turtles…There’s a red-winged blackbird..” (p.11, 1999)

There are many strands to this book: a father and his son on a motorcycle journey across America. The father’s internal dialogue with himself about what he observes in the people and landscapes around him. A story of a troubled young philosopher’s studies. Stories about society. A story about a man unravelling his past. Stories about philosophy itself - from the ancient greeks to modern thinking. Zen is an epic, multi-layered journey through thoughts and feelings of thousands of years. What is most astounding is that some 30 years hence its release the words speak with the same potent clarity and hold the same resonance to modern ears. These varied stories and writing styles illustrate two different types of thinking, the subjective (or aesthetic), and the objective (or rational), and they are at the heart of Pirsig’s novel.

I feel I have to give something of a warning, too. This book won’t make great reading for everyone. Whilst its specific subjects are not mandatory touchstones for a reader - I have no inclination towards motorcycles, for example - the style of writing is probably one that will continue to divide audiences into love it/hate it camps of opinions. This is not a book whereupon every turn of the page yields another twist in a thrilling action adventure. At the risk of offending some - it’s operating on a different level. This is a story, or set of stories, that reward attention and patience and a relaxed mind. The title itself is something of a starting point for this demeanour - on first reading it reveals little and seems perfectly insurmountable. The mind goes blank. And then you’re ready to begin. Some of the ideas that Pirsig writes about are extremely complex, too. When I wrote in my opening post about this being the hardest book I’d ever read, I meant it - and I say that without hubris. There was a point in the story where I sat down one night in March - which now feels a ridiculously long time ago - and read to the end of a page, and then just sat there incredulous, just trying to fully comprehend an idea that felt like a series of Russian dolls unfolding in my mind. And sometimes I couldn’t read any more for a few days, because I wasn’t ready. So, it’s a book that rewards patient reading - but it really does reward it.

Ultimately, I felt uplifted by both the story itself, and the high respect that Pirsig has for his readers. He takes us very seriously, thinks we are intelligent, and pays us the compliment of believing that we can learn to fundamentally change all of our perspectives and experiences. Despite the minor caveat above, I would recommend this book to anyone.

link: Zen’ @ Amazon.co.uk

August 25, 2007

Post BioShock shock

Filed under: Uncategorized, Blog, Videogames — Rob @ 6:04 pm

Just as cute as this On Thursday evening I had finished playing Bioshock and was chatting to a friend on MSN when I heard a crash upstairs. Since I’m alone at my parents house while they’re on holiday, this was pretty unsettling. Not to mention the fact that the house is centuries old and in the middle of nowhere, because this absolutely didn’t cross my mind for a second.

I went up to investigate in the direction of the sound. The darkness swam in front of me so I flicked on the lights. As soon as I did, a bulb blew on the wall right in front of me, and all the lights in the house went out with it. This frankly scared the shit out of me since it had been happening in BioShock all over the place, and I was probably still half-in-and-out of that environment. I backpeddled downstairs to the fuse box. Quickly.

At least I wasn’t playing Condemned; I might have had a heart attack.

When I went back up I found a bunch of shampoo bottles in the bathroom had been knocked off a shelf. I probably should have put more thought into this, but somehow I actually dismissed it and just went back to my friend with a shrug (his suggestion of ghosts was very calming).

..about thirty minutes later I had a visit from a dormouse of the squirrelly aesthetic, who had ventured downstairs from the attic, and was investigating the bins in the kitchen. I coraled him out. He gave me a scare or two because he liked to pop his head out (cute as it was) from around the corner right as I was leaning in to look.

It took me til 3am to get him out the backdoor.. stupidly timid little guy. Stupidly tiring too.

October 14, 2005

Pleasant/strange

Filed under: Uncategorized, Blog — Rob @ 2:55 pm

I just had a pleasant/strange happenstance.

A friend made a drink for me. I just said “whatever you’ve got going.” It was cheap hyper-concentrated orange squash, sugary neon orange liquid that you can feel dissolving your teeth with every mouthful.

This wouldn’t have been particularly amazing if a few moments later I hadn’t bitten into a biscuit (’Coconut Rings’ - pseudo coconut flavoured shortbreads), which sent me reeling back to my childhood where one of the earliest of earliest memories I have (perhaps indeed the earliest) is of enjoying this exact combination at my toddlers playgroup, aged two/three-something.

And then I remembered all the mushy soggy biscuits getting baby-booty-stomped into the carpet, falling off the climbing frame, bashing my teeth on my drinking beaker (repeatedly), and getting my first kisses from a girl called Bethany (who, after a few years later, I wouldn’t ever know again).

And as I come-to in modern day Europe, Sweet Trip’s Velocity : Design : Comfort is playing in the background and all of a sudden it’s the most poignant moment in the world.

October 1, 2005

Mmm, sweaty

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rob @ 11:40 pm

Head asplode.

More here.

For reference this is about the only time you’ll catch me linking to IGN, but alas - do it for the eyecandy.

September 18, 2005

Sounding rather like a hippy

Filed under: Uncategorized, Blog — Rob @ 2:04 am

Well, then. Over a year has gone by since I blogged about exam results, jubilation and forthcoming relaxation, which must mean that I’ll be going off to University soon. Tomorrow (today) in fact.

It’s been a strange old year. It’s strange when you actually sit down and attempt to craft a large portion of time where you cut the strings to anything society-wise and just drift along wherever life takes you. To begin with it is extremely difficult when you don’t have any routines or responsibilities; you feel disconnected from reality. Then after a while, for me anyway, I felt a weight lift and I rather than being isolated or disconnected I just felt free. I’m not sure I can credibly explain it without sounding like a bit of a hippy, so I’ll leave my thoughts for now. Ask me about it in the future.

If it happens that I can’t post at University (god bless firewalls), then this will be my last post for a while, so be happy and stay safe in the meantime!

July 30, 2005

P-A-R-T-Y Poker

Filed under: Uncategorized, Blog — Rob @ 6:47 am

This is going to be one of those posts where I just hit the keyboard running and see where it goes. It’s a Blues riff in B, so watch me for the changes, and try to keep up…

Rob says:
I have a K and an 8

Rob says:
and everyone is calling me.

Rob says:
I hit a K on the flop

Rob says:
but there’s an Ace in there too.

Rob says:
Damnit, I need a king on the river..

GAMBLING, KIDS - JUST SAY NO. Up til last week that had always been my own fully ingrained motto thanks to an upbringing under shrewd just-say-no type parents. Sure, I’d played poker and the like for fun. When you’re playing for penny sweets or bragging rights, it is fun. When money gets involved in gambling (as it tends to do) it’s not quite the same.

Ollie says:
ok dude, so i signed up to pokerroom

Ollie says:
$20 minimum deposit, and these guys SUCK, i’ve just made $20 in 10 mins.

Ollie says:
Well I lost a bit then but it was funny as hell..

Ollie says:
This guy didnt even know what his hand was called!

Ollie says:
I had a jack high, and he was betting all over the place, and all he had was a 7 and a 2!

I got suckered in, as you do. My friend had recently picked up his online poker play and was up A LOT. He explained his tactics and experiences over the course of a conversation and even under some interrogation it seemed like a decent enough course of action. I would sign up, deposit some cash, and hit some poor fools for a couple of dollars before switching tables. All I had to do was play it safe, bet on surefire hands, or bluff when the going got good. Normal score. The clincher was the 20% bonus on my first cash dump. Signed, drawn and quartered..

At first, things were peachy. Ollie and I entered a room together to play a few hands so I could get the feel of the online opponents. They weren’t all that special. Within half an hour we were up around $10 dollars more each. Time passed, and players came and went. Our first mistake was not quitting when we were ahead; when big-money players entered our table with a wad of cash, they gained the control fairly swiftly: even if they were fairly obviously bluffing, with less money it’s impossible to play the percentages and call them on it every time. Inevitably you lose out to them more often than not, and they take your greenbacks. We started to lose..

Rob says:
This is so much BS.

Ollie says:
hold on, we’ll win it back. don’t worry.

Rob says:
Right..not against this prick.

Rob says:
I’m down $12.

Ollie says:
watch me for a hand or two

Ollie says:
i’m gonna bleed him dry, watch me

Rob says:
You can’t, because he ALWAYS bets. And if you sit out and then come in, he folds. So you have to only bet on amazing hands, right? Well then he’s like “waitaminute”. You’ll have a hand one time, but he’ll still bluff you out because he entered the table with money over our heads, and he has all the power. That’s not even poker; poker is giving some guy a look and knowing that his heart is beating a hole in his chest. This is just fucking lame.

Ollie says:
It’s my time..I’ll draw him in.

[…]
Ollie says:
fuck

Ollie says:
Let’s move.

At 4am we were both down at least half our $20 initial deposits. Ollie was worse off than me - on previous days he’d been up as much as $50 before events had taken a dramatic and distinctly red twist. We decided that we couldn’t both win our money back playing at the same table, so my friend went elsewhere.

Gambling is… gambling. Am I indicting it? Not at all. It does what it says on the tin, and it’s your fault for not reading the tin properly. I’m indicting myself. It’s the rocket-fuel highs and the catatonic lows. Your world can fall out from under you in a string of bad hands; your winning streak dries up and you’re left fighting a losing battle against the flow of the game. A sensible person would call it a day and bail. Sensible people don’t gamble.

THE HIGHS. Come 4:30am I was back in the game, and so was my friend. Actually, I was up - A LOT. Not only had I won back the $8 that I’d given away to some high-roller, but I’d managed to entice in people with less money than me who delighted in throwing their cards in the middle on nothing-hands.

Ollie says:
So..?

Rob says:
I’m on $15.70. Seems i hit my luck..

Rob says:
I’ve made up 15 in 15 minutes, i’m nearly back to $20. Well okay now I’m down. But..

[…]
Rob says:
PERFECT

Rob says:
I let this guy in for three rounds, just feeding him up.

Rob says:
Then I play raise me-raise me for flop to river.

Rob says:
He thinks I’m bluffing like I had been, calls me on it again and again..

Rob says:
I win $10 straight out.

Rob says:
$20.05. I am finished. I am happy, fuck, euphoric. I came back from 25 cents!

Ollie says:
Awesome!

I could have quit. That’s the line that gets you later when you check back through your chatlog, when you think back through your mind to all of 30 minutes, hours, a day previous and YOU had played the game, taken the gamble and come out on top. The halcyon skies of euphoria. You’re a sucker, and it hurts.

I think this is about where we came in.

Rob says:
Damnit. A second chance for a king on the river..

Ollie says:
Pfst, flashback humour. In a blog post

Rob says:
..someone will have an ace, I know it.

Rob says:
I
know it.

Rob says:
Oh, god.

Rob says:
Nobody had an ace, but someone hit a 10 on the river and just happened to have two more in the pocket.
On the river.

Rob says:
That’s me done. All gone. No deposit. No bonus. Dead.

This is gambling. To a certain extent I could accept that. Gambling online though is something that I’d always steered clear of and I will never try again - without the ability to stare into your opponents soul and figure him out, you’re a sinking ship when you come up against career bluffers with some money under their belt. Oh, and remember that 20% bonus? Sure, it was only $4, but this is how it works out:

“You need 7 player points for each dollar you want to redeem.”
Player points are earned by playing hands, simple as that. How many hands to get a point? I played over a hundred hands in 6 hours and only got 1 point, so to redeem my 20% bonus of $4 I’d have to play for roughly (7×4)x6 hours. 168 hours. At the rate I was going it would have been a month before I see my $4 bonus that I signed up for - long enough for most people to have either made it or lost it at the round table..

Rob says:
£11. It’s nothing. It’s the way you lose it. The cold, hard fact that you were once even, in the black, and on a different day or hand you might’ve made hundreds. But that’s gambling for you. It ISN’T FAIR. It just seems fair when you’re up. It’s easy enough to win, and it’s enough fun to convince you to throw sense out the window for as long as it takes to throw away your money too.

That’s the gift and the curse of human nature for you.

Sure, it’s £11. But ouch.

July 2, 2005

112028833163657528

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rob @ 7:08 am

It feels good to be back at DevArt.

June 29, 2005

112007983834567519

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rob @ 9:17 pm

When Doom III originally tripped out onto the PC last year it was met with near equal amounts of praise and derision. Initially I defended it for what it was - a technological revamping of an arcade classic which should be taken as that, and not what it perhaps misleadingly claimed to be (”a new era of gaming”). It was as simple a first person shooter as you could ask for; it wasn’t perfect, but when it was good it was..good.

When Half-Life 2 arrived, things changed. HL2 was - is - no where near as graphically advanced as DIII. It does not need a next-gen (or this-gen) computer to run it, or a room full of fans to keep the computer from overheating. I can run it on my laptop and it still looks gorgeous. It looks gorgeous despite the fact that is slightly less than cutting-edge (compared to DIII’s then bleeding-edge), thanks entirely to incredible graphical design by Valve encompassing everything from the play area to facial expressions. I never actually completed DIII before HL2 arrived, and within a week I had sold it after giving it less than five minutes more of my time. Now it was truly a thing of the past.

Flashforward to last night. Hellish thunderstorms and no small amount of rain, a perfect evening to sit down for a quick bash around on the Xbox release. I rented it especially to suit up for the co-op play with a friend who’d done the same, fully expecting to be switching off within the hour. Things change. Two hours later I was exhausted and exhilirated, soaked through with sweat, having enjoyed one of the greatest gameplay experiences of my life. Nothing has ever matched this. Stripped of the clunky cutscenes and the in-game filler material (the whole intro sequence takes less than a minute, compared to 10 or so on the single player release) Doom III co-op over Live is what it should have been all along: slipstreamed run and gun action coupled with continuous holy-shit moments, with absolutely no let up of tension. Hellish indeed.

Anecdotes come easily. There’s the sequence where you play in near pitch-black, and navigate through a room of endless girders and unexpected dead ends. One person is meant to be holding the torch, but when something growls you can forgive him for locking the shotgun in. If only it wasn’t so damn scary. Fire explodes from.. somewhere.. he ducks left to deal with the demons. “HAVING A LITTLE TROUBLE HERE!” We’re separated and alone and I’m running around trying to find him, being pursued from behind by something that I can’t see, trying to clear the path whilst dodging missiles from every angle. “WHERE ARE YOU?! WHERE ARE YOU?!” Eventually I find a quiet corner to reload my weapons, and in the silence I can hear screams and whoops in my earpiece, then nothing. “ALRIGHT I THINK I CLEAR- WHOAH… YEAH I.. OKAY IT’S CLEAR OVER HERE.” “WHERE ARE YOU?” “IT’S DARK AND I CAN’T SEE SHIT. WHERE ARE YOU?” “IT’S DARK HERE TOO. I DON’T KNOW, I WENT ONWARDS AND I’M IN A CORNER SOMEWHERE. SHINE YOUR TORCH SO I CAN SEE YOU” “ROGER THAT.”

In the silence I stumble around the jungle of metal crossbeams and pipes until I see his torch blinking off and on in the distance. I head towards it. The light goes out. “UH, YOU GOT YOUR TORCH ON?” “YEAH?” “UH, OKAY..” More blinking. Probably nothing. Probably not nothing. My footsteps on the metal below. His breathing in my ear. The sudden thought of “WHAT THE HELL IS TH-” as something leaps out from beneath me, I start swinging my torch wildly and backpeddling. Laughter in my earpiece. The demon flicks on his torchlight. “YOU FUCKING BASTARD.” “AHAHA. SCARED OF THE DARK? COME ON, LET’S MOVE ON.”

“ROGER THAT.”

June 18, 2005

111915109888281010

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rob @ 11:18 pm

I’m back!

…although I’m not sure everyone can read this yet. I’ve switched hosts (finally!) and therefore this .com address now points to a different “place”, to different nameservers. Imagine invisible - and quite non-existent - nanobots whizzing along datapipes telling everyone where to go and you get some idea of the propogation process. My new ip is 79.9.248.26, if you want to get pedantic, and that’s where you are right now. If the upshot of this is some of my google traffic getting lost along the way then that’s no bad thing. Moving on..

Before I rang the changes a few days ago I’d already been absent for what seems like ages - I blame that partially on not wanting to backup any more new blog posts, but also on Things. Various projects - most fall into the housekeeping category, some fall into the ‘ooh-this-is-exciting-but-might-not-work-out’ category (and thus remain blissfully unmentioned), and some are in-between.

I’ve aquired a laptop for Uni and spent the last week-and-a-bit fiddling with it. This is the first time I’ve owned my own system outright and so whilst I’ve been tweaking and stylising the hell out of it I’m also incredibly wary of anything going wrong, which accounts for frenetic moodswings from hyper to panicky to aghast when I realise I’ve just uninstalled the internet, or something. I’ve not yet managed to break anything beyond repair, though. Widescreen takes a bit of getting used to, but already I feel like trumpeting some kind of 16:10 revolution. It’s quite fantastically sexy. What’s also good is film editing on the move. I can shoot onto DV, run it down a firewire and edit it wherever I happen to be. And then upload it wirelessly. I’ve yet to take full advantage of that, but it’s pretty exhilirating nonetheless. I’m going out to shoot some footage right after I hit the Publish button on this.

Which is about now, just my luck. More soon, friends.

May 28, 2005

111725190138950754

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rob @ 3:16 am

Once again it seems appropriate for littleeye to report on the reality show with which it shares the same Orwellian basis (even if 1984 only partly inspired the name for this venture some years back). I am of course talking about Big Brother, the UK version of which launched its sixth iteration last night. If you’re not too fond of BB, or you’ve fallen into with the sceptic crowd, then you may just want to skip this post..

Big Brother 2005
With this latest series, production company Endemol could not do much worse than the last two runs, which were - despite some undeniable characters and particular moments (such as they are) - pretty awful. Not everyone agrees with that summation, but I’d risk that the majority of the hardcore does. That said, my own cynicism over the return of show for another year was yet again overwhelmed during the past few weeks by my unabaited fanboy enthusiasm for more Davina, Dermot and BB-related chaos.

At 9pm the 13 housemates gradually made their entrance into the famous enclosure, which, I might add, looks incredibly gorgeous - and interestingly similar design-wise to BB2 (which remains one of my favourite years). My intitial reaction was twofold; despite finding the majority of housemates fairly obnoxious in their video clips, at the same time I was excited to see how they all mixed up once inside.

It’s now 4:30am, and bar several phone conversations (naturally about the show) I have been glued to the live stream ever since. I’m happy to confer to you that I think the housemates are both variously FANTASTIC and fantastic choices for the show. The VTs were astonishinly bad portrayals of nearly all involved - and I sincerely hope that people have stuck with it like me.

By now you’ll either be tuning in or will have long since browsed off - so I shall continue with a brief rundown of my current thoughts on the gang, in the order the entered (if only to follow in the tradition of this sites reportage format!):

Derek
VT summation:
likeable, intelligent, plummy chappy with his head screwed on firmly even if he seems wont to go a little floozy at times.

now: the same.

Lesley
VT summation:
a ridiculously shallow, self-obsessed broad.

now: the same- although she may or may not be harmless. First to get voted off.

Sam
VT summation:
INTELLIGENCE! Rather likeable although she seems to overhype her sexuality which undermines her other qualities.

now: possibly really nice. Quiet and friendly.

Max
VT summation:
north-london wideboy with a dismarming no-nonsense attitude, although laddish tendecies a bit of a letdown.

now: a nice enough guy.

Vanessa
VT summation:
a self-described bitch. Juvenile and pointless.

now: friendly, open, actually quiet retiring, her VT did her a misjustice. Maybe.

Anthony
VT summation:
an utter cock who can’t see the wood for the trees whose sole aim is to look pretty and ’shag birds’.

now: he’s probably a cock, but he has managed to entertain some conversation that didn’t revolve around fuckwittage, and was far less noisy than his boistrous introduction.

Roberto
VT summation:
intelligent older guy, possibly a bit vain though likely that was show.

now: one of the nicest of the bunch, a diplomat, a listener, a debater, good stories. Top bloke.

Makosi
VT summation:
wow, cute. oh, a bitch. oh, she’s just silly. no, she’s really quite thick. actually-..

now: the one housemate who will probably infuriate and charm in equal measure, from a Reality-TV point of view she’s pure gold - a contradiction waiting to fall down (a African-born Christian virgin who has an obssesive interest in sex, and more), or not. Likeable enough when she doesn’t shout down everybody.

Makosi got the booby-task of having to get people pissed off so that she gets the most votes and therefore immunity from her auto-nomination, so not sure whether she’s playing a game or not. Great TV.

Craig
VT summation:
opinionated wassername, possibly a twat but one that I personally agree with on some issues

now: not a twat. Pretty intelligent guy who had a lengthy debate with Makosi in the snug (with Roberto and Mary) about sex and nudity, a good debater, probably a nice chap even if he says “you know what I mean?” WAY too much.

Mary
VT summation:
kooky is cool, a white witch who charmed the pants off me by being NICE.

now: my favourite housemate of the bunch so far, she was nervous following a chaotic entrance, but found her form in the den later. Really intelligent, not at all weird, pretty adorable. Mary to win! etc

Science
VT summation:
awesomely cool wanabe-rapper from the Tupac school of things (ie, not a cock) - he even looks like him.

now: down to earth, waiting to find his footing but will probably shine in coming weeks depending on company.

Saski
VT summation:
INTELLIGENCE! Not merely a pair of tits, as she stated rather astutely.

now: a real likeable lady - took Mary to one side for a long and really caring chat about her nerves and generally seemed like perfect housemate material.

Kemal
VT summation:
very bright young guy with his head fairly screwed on.

now: the same. And experimental dressing to boot!

Right, I’m knackered. littleeye out.

Next Page »